Easygenerator vs Adobe Captivate: a detailed comparison for L&D teams 

Quick summary

Easygenerator and Adobe Captivate are both well-known e-learning authoring tools, but they solve different problems. Captivate is built for instructional designers who need control over complex simulations and advanced interactivity. Easygenerator is built for speed and scale. It helps organizations create company-tailored learning faster by enabling both L&D and internal experts to take part in course creation.

Choosing between Easygenerator and Adobe Captivate

Adobe Captivate is often selected by teams that need to build detailed simulations or technical training. Its strength lies in precision and design flexibility. However, this power comes with trade-offs. Captivate requires specialist skills, a desktop setup, and more production time.

Easygenerator is designed for teams that want to scale learning creation across departments and regions. It enables L&D to collaborate with internal experts to capture knowledge faster. This approach supports just-in-time learning, especially in fast-moving organizations.

Easygenerator is often used as an Adobe Captivate alternative when teams want to reduce production bottlenecks and involve more people in the learning creation process.

Key differences between Easygenerator and Adobe Captivate

How Easygenerator supports scalable learning creation

Scaling learning means giving more people the ability to create quality content. Easygenerator includes built-in tools that help teams work faster without sacrificing quality.

EasyAI

EasyAI provides built-in didactic support, helping authors structure content, generate outlines, and suggest assessments, all in a few clicks. It ensures consistency and quality across all courses, even when created by non-instructional designers.

EasyTranslate

EasyTranslate makes translation fast and cost-effective. Teams can translate courses into 75+ languages, edit them locally, and maintain one connected version for updates. This helps global companies deliver localized training without complexity.

Collaboration

Authors and reviewers can co-create in real time, leave comments, and make changes together. This ensures content evolves continuously, based on feedback and team input.

Pricing

Easygenerator uses a seat-based pricing model with a twist. Once enterprises reach a certain number of authors, additional seats can be added at no extra cost. This makes it ideal for large organizations that want to scale learning creation across hundreds (or even thousands) of internal experts.

Which tool helps you scale learning creation

Different authoring philosophies

Captivate was designed for instructional designers who manage complex training projects. Its authoring model centers production within L&D teams, which slows down delivery when demand increases.

Easygenerator flips this model by enabling employees themselves to create and update learning content. L&D can focus on strategy and quality control, while internal experts handle day-to-day training creation. This approach keeps learning relevant, up-to-date, and scalable.

Peer learning advantage

Internal experts hold most of the knowledge in a business. When only L&D teams create training, this knowledge stays locked in teams and slows down operations. Peer learning solves this by giving employees a simple way to share what they know.

Easygenerator makes this possible with a didactic framework that guides authors step by step. Instead of long production cycles, teams can create and publish training in days or even hours.

Ease of use and adoption

Adobe Captivate is a powerful tool, but it has a steep learning curve. Teams often need formal training to use it effectively, and production work tends to stay within L&D or specialized e-learning roles.

Easygenerator is designed for fast adoption. Authors can build their first course within a day, even without instructional design experience. The interface is simple, and the platform provides a built-in structure to guide authors. This makes it easier to onboard non-technical authors and scale content creation across teams.

Content quality and consistency

Scaling learning creation should not mean losing quality. Easygenerator uses a built-in didactic structure and templates to help authors create clear and impactful training. EasyAI also supports content quality by suggesting learning objectives, outlines, and questions.

Captivate allows for advanced customization and interactivity, but course quality depends heavily on the designer’s expertise. Without strong design skills, teams might struggle to maintain consistency across various types of content.

Scaling globally

Large organizations often need localized training for different markets. Captivate supports multilingual publishing but requires manual export and import workflows for each translation. This increases maintenance time and makes it harder to keep translations aligned.

Easygenerator simplifies this with EasyTranslate. Teams can translate courses into many languages directly in the platform and update all versions at once. EasyTranslate comes with unlimited translations and edits, making it a practical option for companies with global teams.

Integrations and LMS publishing

Captivate exports SCORM packages that can be uploaded to most LMSs. However, each update requires a new export and re-upload.

Easygenerator also supports SCORM and xAPI and adds dynamic SCORM. With dynamic SCORM, courses stay connected to the LMS and update instantly without any re-upload. Easygenerator also offers native integrations with LMSs like Cornerstone and LearnUpon.

Support and enablement that drive adoption

Captivate users rely primarily on help articles and community forums. Live support is limited, and teams are responsible for implementation and onboarding.

Easygenerator provides 24/5 live support and guided onboarding. Enterprise customers also have access to a dedicated Customer Success Manager who supports rollout and adoption. Teams can join enablement sessions to improve content quality and get practical advice at any stage.

Pricing and total cost of ownership

Captivate uses a per-license pricing model. Costs increase with every new user, which makes it harder to scale learning creation across a large organization.

Easygenerator’s pricing supports scale. After a certain number of authors are added, additional authors can join at no extra cost. This helps enterprises involve more internal experts without increasing budgets.

When to choose Easygenerator vs. Adobe Captivate

Choose Easygenerator if you want to:

• Scale learning creation across teams
• Enable internal experts to contribute
• Publish training quickly
• Translate and maintain content easily
• Reduce long production cycles

Choose Adobe Captivate if you want to:

• Build advanced simulations
• Create complex software walkthroughs
• Work in a desktop production environment
• Keep course creation within a specialist team

Alternatives to Adobe Captivate

If you are comparing e-learning authoring tools, other alternatives to Adobe Captivate include iSpring and Articulate.

iSpring offers a PowerPoint-based authoring experience and is suitable for teams who prefer to build simple courses in a familiar environment. Articulate provides advanced design control and professional authoring tools.

However, for organizations that want to scale content creation and involve internal experts, Easygenerator is the most practical Adobe Captivate alternative. It supports peer learning, fast publishing, and company-tailored learning at scale.

Final thoughts

Adobe Captivate is a strong choice for specialist e-learning teams that build complex simulations. But when speed matters and content needs to adapt fast, Easygenerator is the better option. It enables L&D teams and internal experts to work together, reduce production time, and create learning that keeps up with the business.

Easygenerator brings together simplicity, collaboration, and scale, making it a modern alternative to Adobe Captivate for today’s L&D teams.